Nominator: A coin holder who stakes or delegates their coin to one or more validator. Validator: A semi-trusted entity responsible for validating and producing blocks. Epoch: A cycle of few blocks in which validator nodes create blocks in turn.

1. 1.

   In Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) anyone can participate in Validator (Block

   Producer) elections and those who hold the network token are able to cast votes

   to one or more Validator (Block Producers) candidates.
2. 2.

   Votes are weighted by the voter’s stake and the Validators (Block Producers)

   candidates who receive a maximum number of votes become Validator (Block

   Producer).
3. 3.

   Users can also delegate their voting power to some other user, who can then vote

   on their behalf.
4. 4.

   Validator(Block Producer) can be voted in or out anytime so the threat of loss

   of income becomes a major incentive against bad behaviour.
5. 5.

   Token holder votes are tallied after a specific time or after each epoch.

1. 1.

   Scalability Blocks can be propagated through the network much more

   efficiently. And blocks can be produced more consistently and reliably in a much

   shorter time frame. Moreover, finality can be reached as soon as ⅔ of the block

   producer has confirmed a transaction.
2. 2.

   Network Infrastructure In DPoS users have control over who will provide the

   infrastructure unlike PoW and PoS, where users have no choice on validators. In

   DPoS, validators can be thought of as employees of users(nominators) and can be

   fired for not performing their duties.
3. 3.

   On-Chain Governance DPoS is a liquid form of democracy where voting power can

   be allocated to other participants and votes can be changed at any time. While

   block producers are the primary use case, but token holder voting can be

   conducted on different things like monetary policy, development funding and many

   more.
4. 4.

   Self-Funding Through Inflation In DPoS, unlike PoS or PoW where miners get

   rewards for validating a block, inflation is used to pay block producers as well

   as to fund the development of platform itself.

1. 1.

   Exploit Low Voter Turnout

   This problem exists in almost all PoS protocols, as the participants who show up and actually vote are really less.

   Voting is done by whales, exchanges and wallet providers. Although one good thing in DPoS is that, tokens can

   delegate voting power and still retain all of their utility.
2. 2.

   Bribing Attacks It is a case where Validators (Block Producers) pay for their

   votes, they pay a small percentage of their earning per block. Although it may

   be good for some people, in the long term it will harm as the Validators who

   would do this wouldn’t be able to scale up their systems and hence the block

   production will be slowed down. To tackle these attacks there is a **voting

   decay** concept where freshly cast votes are considered full while other votes

   will slowly decay until they have a minimal impact after 2 years. This will

   encourage participation and slowly discount those who just cast their votes

   once.
3. 3.

   Block Producers Collude The main problem this can cause is a delay in the

   transaction and double spends. Although these situations are highly unlikely.